Packard ixtreme M5740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5740  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FMP55
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 09:11
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 140
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 366
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 40.1
38% 43.7 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.7
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,633
Write 3,416
Mixed 3,411
779% 3,487 MB/s
4K Read 222
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 120
560% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 434
336% 461 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
786GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 125 124 127 114 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 117
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
348GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 85 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 84.3
Write 80.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 85.2
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
40GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 8 7.5 6.8 6.8 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 3
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 7
15% 13 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5740 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback