Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion AZ224AV-ABA 300-1100z (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON JESSE
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '20 at 22:14
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 600e 73 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 63.5 36% 53.8 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 121 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2A8E) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.82 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 314GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 195 183 199 190 189 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.8% Below average	Read 221 Write 192 Mixed 206 SusWrite 188 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 11.5 40% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 95.2 77% 108 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.5% Poor	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10.4 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16