RM DESKTOP 310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	RM DESKTOP 310 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ67OW
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110401
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '20 at 16:38
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 150 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 358 36% 295 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 863F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.8% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 62.7 58% 68.5 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 49.5 49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 66 61 104 107 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 120 Write 104 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 86.4 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 351GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 90 93 89 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 102 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 87.9 64% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GB 3,272 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 10.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DESKTOP 310 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP 310

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	50x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	43x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	5x
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	4x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GBSamsungBench 54%, 42 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $256

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16