Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 12:26
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 333
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,104
107% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,597
99% 1,597 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 250
Parallax 322
239% 288 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 238
Splatting 144
179% 230 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,038
Write 880
Mixed 482
246% 1,133 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 45.9
219% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 847
670% 929 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
181GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 317 317 319 319 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 450
Mixed 450
SusWrite 338
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 56.6
188% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
205GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 455 456 456 457 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 450
Mixed 368
SusWrite 456
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 54.7
186% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 196
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
525GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1887 1887 1591 1455 1463 1460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 1,882
Mixed 1,796
SusWrite 1,624
442% 1,974 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 94.7
317% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 1,258
DQ Mixed 1,323
993% 1,323 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 360%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
130GB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 81 75 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 86.8
Write 92.8
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 78.4
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback