| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus G11CD-K (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK G11CD-K |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170411 |
| Uptime | 8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 12 '20 at 09:17 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.5%
Average
|
61% 103 Pts
|
19% 142 Pts
|
8% 124 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.5%
Above average
|
58% 70.6 fps
|
54% 66.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFS256G32TND-N210A 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 253 218 236 257 236 MB/s
|
||||
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
104GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 111 103 104 104 104 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
82% 113 MB/s
|
122% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
32.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
35% 114 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,726 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus G11CD-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 906x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 724x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 451x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 296x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 235x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $211 |