Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '20 at 11:12
Run Duration	347 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 146 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 435 42% 348 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 88.1 53% 73.6 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 56 51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 329 329 319 321 317 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 586 Write 437 Mixed 505 SusWrite 341 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 61 199% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 479 DQ Write 382 DQ Mixed 430 322% 430 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 102GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 420 420 259 269 269 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 410 Mixed 305 SusWrite 326 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 52.7 172% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 3.2 54% 133 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 128%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 181GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 720 10 385 55 76 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 1,202 Write 841 Mixed 742 SusWrite 217 167% 751 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 97.5 4K Mixed 60.9 201% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 221 202% 306 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 209%
LB M3 1T SSD 1TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 342GB free Firmware: 907XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 71 21 80 59 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 434 Write 144 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 57.8 35% 163 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 0.6 35% 9.6 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 1.5 24% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 80%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 153GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 419 420 434 401 399 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 417 Mixed 404 SusWrite 402 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 52.3 163% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 180 155% 230 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 177GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 409 406 394 417 359 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 412 Mixed 400 SusWrite 400 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 53.3 173% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 198 156% 220 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.8 Write 14.7 Mixed 10.5 18% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 56% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB 4,979 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 20 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 14.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16