Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 90 2-Core 174 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 437 44% 360 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3972) 2GB CLim: 789 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.64% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 7 Parallax 8.72 6% 7.7 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 8.93 Splatting 9.96 8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.64% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB 2,727 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 79 69 76 43 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 442 Write 274 Mixed 103 SusWrite 94.7 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 14.1 33% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 45.6 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 131 77% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GB 6,794 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 17.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	145x
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	90x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	49x
RMT3170EB68E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 50%, 1,230 samples	17x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 1,072 samples	16x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $509

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16