AZW GK55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW GK55  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GK55
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 01:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 36.5
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 111
38% 68 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 227
28% 216 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.41
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 6.48
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.68%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0819B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 367 382 172 136 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 451
Write 376
Mixed 372
SusWrite 256
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 28.8
116% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 48.3
89% 170 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 13
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GK55 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AZW GK55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback