Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 16:47
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 248
91% 157 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 784
81% 637 Pts
64-Core 932
63% 932 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.22
5% 8.65 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.4
6% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 173
Parallax 188
144% 180 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 188
Splatting 124
152% 168 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 147%
Great: 202%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 644 642 619 503 243 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,936
Write 1,647
Mixed 890
SusWrite 575
281% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 78.6
258% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1339
DQ Write 1,152
DQ Mixed 1,234
928% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 248%
Great: 285%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 23
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 27.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback