Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB

Performance Results


Gaming 157% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 160% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 144 2-Core 291 97% 177 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 986 89% 747 Pts	64-Core 1,535 95% 1,535 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	170% Outstanding	Lighting 243 Reflection 223 Parallax 273 198% 246 fps	MRender 293 Gravity 213 Splatting 133 166% 213 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 79 98 24 12 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 1,251 Write 1,094 Mixed 194 SusWrite 103 145% 661 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 38.6 130% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 620 DQ Write 91.8 DQ Mixed 102 139% 271 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 255%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 223 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2TB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 37 41 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 40.7 Write 41.2 Mixed 38 SusWrite 40.5 55% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D12.2356WS.001 2x8GB 1,120 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 21.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 24.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 125%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,608x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	168x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	151x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	1,213x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	206x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	122x

SSD
AS340 480GBApacerBench 73%, 5,317 samples	152x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	138x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	121x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	800x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	100x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	78x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $718

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16