Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 15:25
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 249
91% 157 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 640
72% 555 Pts
64-Core 761
51% 761 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.25
5% 8.76 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7.03
Splatting 16
6% 11.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 170
Parallax 190
146% 180 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 184
Splatting 126
148% 166 fps
Poor: 140%
This bench: 147%
Great: 198%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 635 619 507 360 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,882
Write 1,550
Mixed 978
SusWrite 527
275% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 77.9
256% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 1,194
883% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 239%
Great: 292%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 5,976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback