| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161118 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 10 '20 at 11:22 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.2%
Good
|
56% 94.2 Pts
|
42% 346 Pts
|
28% 444 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
110%
Outstanding
|
106% 166 fps
|
126% 156 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 192 208 212 213 213 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
47% 207 MB/s
|
106% 36.3 MB/s
|
31% 43.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.2%
Average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
| Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $144 |