HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81ED
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200626
Uptime6 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 18:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 132
54% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 259
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 386 378 358 365 382 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 395
Write 381
Mixed 372
SusWrite 376
283% 381 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 40.6
6,690% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 289
2,850% 334 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
SDXC Card 64GB
34GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 24 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 21.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 23.1
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3
192% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16S4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback