Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130205
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '20 at 17:00
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 52 2-Core 104 54% 82 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 283 30% 237 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 21D7) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 12.9 12% 13.1 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 12.6 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 105 97 98 135 146 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.4% Good	Read 267 Write 174 Mixed 187 SusWrite 119 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 79.7 4K Mixed 36.7 121% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 128 113% 171 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 791GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 118 118 119 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 119 Write 113 Mixed 103 SusWrite 117 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free, PID 168e SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 27 26 25 25 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 181 Write 48 Mixed 34 SusWrite 25.4 73% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 40%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 4TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 904GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 116 118 120 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 122 Write 113 Mixed 59.6 SusWrite 118 137% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 76%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 130 129 130 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 141 Write 138 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 128 161% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 72%
asmedia ASMT1153E 1TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 316GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 42 41 41 42 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 82.8 Write 83.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 43.7 80% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 71%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 524GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 102 Write 93.8 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 42.7 95% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 58%
SABRENT 160GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 76GB free, PID 1561 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 62.1 Mixed 42.8 55% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 33%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 41 42 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 136 Write 134 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 42.8 120% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.6% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.6 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 9.3 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16