Medion MD34646

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion MD34646 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B360H4-EM
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 732 77% 618 Pts	64-Core 743 46% 743 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 9559) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2425 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Lighting 97.2 Reflection 91.4 Parallax 81.2 79% 90 fps	MRender 84.6 Gravity 85.5 Splatting 81.4 68% 83.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GB 656 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 799 Write 1,975 Mixed 1,102 293% 1,292 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 61.5 202% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,206 DQ Write 796 DQ Mixed 521 518% 841 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 233%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 217GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 137 137 135 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 151 Write 142 Mixed 32 SusWrite 134 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 107%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 324GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 105 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 106 Write 39.3 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 102 53% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 153% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 466GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 87 88 87 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 85.8 Write 86.5 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 87.2 106% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 24.7 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 26.5 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34646 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Medion MD34646

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x
E12-512G-PHISON- 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 208 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	2x
BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 2x8GBUnknownBench 88%, 3,575 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $403

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16