Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 11:10
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 230
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 666
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 191
Parallax 246
170% 215 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 221
Splatting 134
166% 213 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 155%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 173 156 160 161 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 461
Write 449
Mixed 302
SusWrite 168
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.2
151% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 232
191% 277 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 124%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
931GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2102 2143 2210 2207 1534 1003 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,318
Write 2126
Mixed 1,479
SusWrite 1,867
437% 1,947 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.9
205% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,414
DQ Write 1,256
DQ Mixed 1,325
996% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 329%
Great: 370%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
259GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 451 323 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 447
Mixed 400
SusWrite 242
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.3
160% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
10GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 68 85 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 90
Write 79
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 87.5
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
80GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 153 132 141 174 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 137
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 144
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D4-2400-MR Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 08D9 16G-D4-2400-MR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $467
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback