Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M470-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2778-C1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 18:52
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 123
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 295
31% 249 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 331.65
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 1.97
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 3.65
4% 4.42 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01AAD020C 200GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AK001W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 34 37 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 36.3
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 36.5
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 34%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
179GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 119 120 119 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 115
Write 105
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 119
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
419GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 132 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 133
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
202GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 84
Write 83.8
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 64.7
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M470-2 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback