MSI X299 PRO (MS-7B94)

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B94
Motherboard	MSI X299 PRO (MS-7B94) (all builds)
Memory	39.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200601
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '20 at 18:12
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900X 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 82.4 1-Core 144 2-Core 293 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 575 8-Core 1,142 101% 859 Pts	64-Core 1,896 117% 1,896 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.1% Above average	Lighting 66.2 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 52.6 54% 62 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 67.2 Splatting 71.2 57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1635 Write 754 Mixed 577 216% 988 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 38.1 136% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 691 DQ Write 87.2 DQ Mixed 248 217% 342 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 24GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 177 171 164 160 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 471 Write 375 Mixed 330 SusWrite 179 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 30.9 108% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 85.3 DQ Mixed 167 140% 213 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 124%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199 9,250 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 241GB free Firmware: X211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 161 144 196 178 221 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 335 Write 284 Mixed 150 SusWrite 184 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 25.2 94% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 110 93% 140 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 114%
Intel MEMPEK1W016GA 14GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 207% 1GB free Firmware: K3110300 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 654 Write 127 Mixed 214 72% 332 MB/s	4K Read 194 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 55.1 386% 96.4 MB/s	DQ Read 794 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 107 159% 320 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 245%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 515GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 87 86 85 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 80.4 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 86.3 51% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.7 321% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 94%
Seagate ST4000NE0025-2EW107 4TB 1,117 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 1TB free Firmware: EN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 135 133 131 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 157 Write 146 Mixed 76.6 SusWrite 132 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 250% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 156 159 159 156 160 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 138 Mixed 75 SusWrite 156 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 113%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.8 3 3 3 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.24% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 1.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 2.9 6% 5.57 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.24% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D30CEST.16FD BLS16G4D30CEST.16FD 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	119% Outstanding	MC Read 41.2 MC Write 64.9 MC Mixed 38.5 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 11.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 PRO (MS-7B94) Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 177%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 192%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 PRO (MS-7B94)

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	117x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	78x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	70x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	55x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	47x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	21x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	80x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	69x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,401

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16