Packard imedia S3810

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Packard imedia S3810 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard imedia S3810
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101013
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '20 at 14:11
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 124 59% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 138 22% 160 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 35.4 34% 35.6 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37 Splatting 34.1 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ldlc F7+120GB 120GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 152 47 48 51 49 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.2% Poor	Read 201 Write 182 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 85.7 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 6.9 32% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 32.1 DQ Mixed 1.2 8% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB 5,027 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 230GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 188 188 187 188 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.4% Above average	Read 197 Write 187 Mixed 180 SusWrite 183 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 25.7 92% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.9 DQ Write 86.7 DQ Mixed 52.2 43% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CM3X2G1333C9 None CM3X2G1333C9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.5% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 11 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S3810 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3810

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	43x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	24x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	11x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	18x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	16x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	13x

SSD
CS900 250GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 2,686 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBToshibaBench 29%, 236 samples	9x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	7x
CT25664BD160B.C8FK 4x2GBCrucialBench 31%, 10 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16