Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 113 38% 68.7 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 226 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(F000 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.29 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 6.48 4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 C100 128GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 130 137 132 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 422 Write 135 Mixed 148 SusWrite 128 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 8.7 71% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 56.4 64% 110 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	48x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	48x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16