Asrock B365M Pro4-F

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Pro4-F (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 129 2-Core 253 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 686 75% 595 Pts	64-Core 684 42% 684 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 120 Parallax 110 96% 116 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 86.5 86% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512 512GB 4,680 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMJ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 394 414 376 386 249 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 158 Write 99 Mixed 83 SusWrite 370 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 27.3 70% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 183 156% 226 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 96%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 589GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 176 170 168 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 151 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 172 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IRX3000D464L16S/8G 2x8GB 3,194 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 35 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 24.3 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 25.4 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4-F

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	365x
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	107x
Core i7-9700FIntel $290Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	121x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	110x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	90x

SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	37x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	34x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	34x

RAM
CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 12,037 samples	35x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	33x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $342

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16