Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200706
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '20 at 11:04
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 63.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 293 88% 169 Pts	4-Core 588 8-Core 907 92% 747 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 105%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3723) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 105 Reflection 140 Parallax 133 86% 126 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 138 Splatting 107 115% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 134%
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 16 Parallax 18.8 16% 18.2 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.7 16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 263 208 220 235 201 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 395 Write 337 Mixed 235 SusWrite 223 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 26.9 88% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 44.8 44% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 117%
ST3500418AS 6TB 4TB free Firmware: FS1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 123 174 169 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 4.2 Write 144 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 164 18% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.6 MB/s

Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 179 110 179 179 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 114 Write 142 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 157 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB 5,437 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 20.8 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 16.8 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	204x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $552

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16