Performance Results


Gaming 155% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 166% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900X 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 84.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 233 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 980 91% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,782 110% 1,782 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 4040) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte G1 Gaming CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	172% Outstanding	Lighting 241 Reflection 245 Parallax 302 196% 263 fps	MRender 302 Gravity 233 Splatting 142 175% 225 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 342 390 277 212 386 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 245 Mixed 238 SusWrite 325 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 38.6 140% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 332 246% 327 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 124%
Lacie P9227 Slim 1TB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 165GB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 41 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 28.5 26% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 178% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 69%
Innostor Innostor 8GB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 5GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 14 14 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	9.48% Terrible	Read 38.3 Write 18.5 Mixed 28 SusWrite 14.2 31% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 40% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.2% Very good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 23.1 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 11.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 152%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	49x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	48x

RAM
BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG 4x4GBCrucialBench 82%, 497 samples	53x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	32x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	25x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $744

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16