Performance Results


Gaming 161% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 162% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8455
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 157 2-Core 309 101% 186 Pts	4-Core 607 8-Core 1,106 103% 856 Pts	64-Core 1,588 98% 1,588 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% HP(103C 8550) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	157% Outstanding	Lighting 219 Reflection 226 Parallax 223 178% 222 fps	MRender 263 Gravity 217 Splatting 131 159% 204 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB 17,828 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 847 835 824 832 825 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2,085 Write 1,959 Mixed 960 SusWrite 851 327% 1,464 MB/s	4K Read 62.2 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 84.5 276% 95.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,147 DQ Write 853 DQ Mixed 1,028 761% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 306%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2319 2428 2429 1685 1300 1206 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	336% Outstanding	Read 2,043 Write 2,357 Mixed 1,056 SusWrite 1,894 414% 1,838 MB/s	4K Read 62 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 85.9 283% 98.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,259 DQ Write 1,039 DQ Mixed 1,132 852% 1,143 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 336% Great: 435%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 191 192 192 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 188 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 191 108% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB 889 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 27.4 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 28.7 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	139x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	115x
Quadro P2200NvidiaBench 47%, 5,007 samples	91x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	245x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	88x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H2 256GBSamsungBench 204%, 754 samples	56x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	92x
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,612 samples	66x
16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 2x16GBMicronBench 82%, 771 samples	42x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16