Asrock 880GMH-LE/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 880GMH-LE/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110902
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '17 at 03:56
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165 5,709 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 80.8 1-Core 42 2-Core 78.3 45% 67 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 167 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E100) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 2.91 4% 4.79 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.07 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 347GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 25769804033 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 162 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 188980199465 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	92.7% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 176 Mixed 157 121% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.08 42% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59 3,786 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 82GB free Firmware: V44OA9BA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 120 120 21493907747 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 22952 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 62856 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3910 (C0) Power-off retract count 80 80 25005 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 25005 (C2) HDA temperature 152 152 240519086116 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	31.9% Below average	Read 55.2 Write 55.4 Mixed 50.2 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.38 112% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 36%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 52GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 75 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34387919279 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5105 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 23129 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 667 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5178 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5178 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 214749544484 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.5% Excellent	Read 149 Write 132 Mixed 99.9 95% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 107%
SAMSUNG HD321KJ 320GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 80GB free, PID 00a2 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 24.4 Write 23.9 Mixed 23.9 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.33 52% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11.1 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 79.1 50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880GMH-LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH-LE/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
LCS-128M6S 128GBLiteonitBench 76%, 1,777 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16