Performance Results


Gaming 185% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 187% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191002
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$321 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 98.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 293 100% 180 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,097 102% 848 Pts	64-Core 1,637 101% 1,637 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3896) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	178% Outstanding	Lighting 263 Reflection 235 Parallax 284 215% 261 fps	MRender 290 Gravity 232 Splatting 115 163% 212 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74 6,712 User benchmarks, average bench 262% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1658 1190 1032 985 800 1083 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,719 Write 1,866 Mixed 1,458 SusWrite 1,125 347% 1,542 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 38.2 158% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 766 DQ Mixed 947 707% 947 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 335%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 343GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1711 1680 1680 1694 1692 1673 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 1,825 Write 1,681 Mixed 1,305 SusWrite 1,688 366% 1,625 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 44.2 173% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,188 DQ Write 908 DQ Mixed 1,034 777% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 393%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 6TB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 485GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 30 30 29 28 29 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 224 Write 15 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 28.3 53% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 159%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4133 C19 2x8GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 46.1 MC Mixed 31.3 114% 39.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 50.6 SC Mixed 35.9 104% 36.3 GB/s	Latency 42.2 95% 42.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	64x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	77x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	73x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	68x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	73x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $704

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16