Asus UX305FA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus UX305FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UX305FA
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150205
Uptime	21.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	90%
CPU Throttled	85%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y71 3,052 User benchmarks, average bench 45% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 31 2-Core 55.2 32% 48 Pts	4-Core 82.1 8-Core 90.8 11% 86.4 Pts	64-Core 93.1 6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 181D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 2.56 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.13 3% 3.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 256GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: MA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 127 181 184 209 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 377 Write 372 Mixed 315 SusWrite 204 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 27.5 89% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 162 132% 188 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 110%
SanDisk Ultra USB 2.0 32GB 771 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID 556c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 5.4 6 5.9 6.6 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Read 17 Write 10.5 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 6.6 13% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.7 72% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.6 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.1 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical UX305FA Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus UX305FA

CPU
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	144x
Core M-5Y10IntelBench 47%, 478 samples	40x
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	21x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	205x

SSD
X300s SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 77%, 785 samples	68x
M600 SATA M.2 256GBMicronBench 84%, 2,750 samples	46x
X300s SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 71%, 618 samples	31x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	87x
2x4GBHynixBench 60%, 11,918 samples	41x
2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 7,517 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16