Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY320
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1920 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 11:10
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 67.1 1-Core 137 2-Core 271 84% 159 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 665 71% 568 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87B5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	181% Outstanding	Lighting 262 Reflection 252 Parallax 307 214% 274 fps	MRender 298 Gravity 241 Splatting 143 177% 227 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,092 Write 1,485 Mixed 1139 347% 1,572 MB/s	4K Read 61.3 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 78.4 272% 95.9 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 945 DQ Mixed 1,014 747% 979 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Asmt 2115 480GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 169GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 236 234 210 209 208 MB/s Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50% Average	Read 278 Write 193 Mixed 166 SusWrite 222 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 20.9 70% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 85.9 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 61.5 51% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 46.8 MC Write 47.2 MC Mixed 40.9 128% 45 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 39.4 SC Mixed 28.8 83% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	264x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	142x
GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 36%, 6,904 samples	90x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	67x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	53x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	33x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	256x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16