| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170316 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 05 '20 at 01:07 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.8%
Very good
|
70% 123 Pts
|
50% 374 Pts
|
24% 395 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
130%
Outstanding
|
143% 195 fps
|
126% 159 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 74 33 75 59 33 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
53% 241 MB/s
|
116% 41 MB/s
|
102% 163 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST1500LM003-9YH148 1.5TB
988GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 50 61 48 63 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
45% 60.7 MB/s
|
102% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
545GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 156 157 157 157 MB/s
|
91.5%
Outstanding
|
108% 147 MB/s
|
238% 1.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.2%
Below average
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
49% 82 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 414x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 238x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 220x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 283x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 218x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 193x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |