Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '20 at 01:48
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 136 2-Core 244 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 674 67% 547 Pts	64-Core 738 46% 738 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 185 Parallax 171 134% 174 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 163 Splatting 122 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	5.7% Terrible	Lighting 8.23 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 8.5 7% 9.3 fps	MRender 7.43 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 0.13 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK128MBF 128GB 465 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 424 432 313 158 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 434 Mixed 364 SusWrite 317 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 44.4 161% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 233 204% 303 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 170GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 110 112 108 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 12.7 Write 77.8 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 110 41% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 324GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 60 46 44 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 153 Write 151 Mixed 109 SusWrite 45.8 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 109%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 615 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 533GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 82 80 77 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 108 Write 133 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 81 143% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	470x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	421x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	202x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16