Asrock Z270 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 141% UFO	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	174% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '20 at 17:55
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 87.7 1-Core 132 2-Core 247 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 695 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 702 43% 702 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87B0); asus tuf oc 10GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	174% Outstanding	Lighting 250 Reflection 220 Parallax 305 204% 258 fps	MRender 290 Gravity 230 Splatting 137 170% 219 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 464 Write 476 Mixed 393 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 56.9 194% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 225GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 169 167 164 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 120 Write 124 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 167 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 130 130 129 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	64% Good	Read 96.6 Write 112 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 127 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB 7,794 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 19.4 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 20 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Pro4 - $176

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	547x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	274x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	189x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	163x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	159x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x
Green 240GB (2016)WDBench 53%, 20,831 samples	33x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	51x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 21,822 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $690

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16