Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 01:38
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 64.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 282
84% 161 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 904
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,797
111% 1,797 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 140
Parallax 132
106% 134 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 126
Splatting 103
91% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
587GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 438 444 438 455 454 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 326
Write 313
Mixed 305
SusWrite 446
79% 347 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 335
254% 342 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 124%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
670GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.8 27 37 6.1 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.27% Terrible
Read 7
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 14.6
2% 9.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 99%
Pcie SSD 512GB
249GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1266 555 512 542 553 554 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 680
Write 1,238
Mixed 782
SusWrite 664
191% 841 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 24.5
90% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 1006
700% 868 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 131%
Great: 267%
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58
506GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 40 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 41
Write 25
Mixed 29
SusWrite 37.6
25% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 56%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 394GB
119GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 31 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 37
Write 30
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 31.8
42% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.5
232% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 23
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback