Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 499 67% 500 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.6% Below average	Lighting 35 Reflection 32 Parallax 40.9 29% 36 fps	MRender 49.3 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 34.7 34% 43.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 56 57 58 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB 4,731 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 318GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 60 60 62 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 126 Write 116 Mixed 113 SusWrite 59.8 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.3% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	76x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	70x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	67x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $989

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16