Asus M5A97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '17 at 13:21
Run Duration433 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 65
2-Core 118
57% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 201
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 61.2
58% 67.4 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 65.3
55% 67 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
121GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 505
Write 437
Mixed 453
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 13.8
85% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 62
63% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 99%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 499
Write 185
Mixed 197
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 12.3
64% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 42.8
50% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
96GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 73.2
Write 74
Mixed 70.1
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.46
101% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 69%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
10.5TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 24
Mixed 23.8
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
5.5TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 24
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.1
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 20%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 137
Write 140
Mixed 91.7
154% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.18
84% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
Read 118
Write 101
Mixed 71.6
119% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.26
66% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 49%
ST3000VX 000-1CU166 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 87.3
148% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.19
45% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-00ZCT0 320GB
298GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
Read 57.3
Write 65
Mixed 40.7
69% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.33
80% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 21%
WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0 2TB
64GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 58.2
Mixed 34.2
62% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.16
52% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
6GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 63
Write 78.6
Mixed 61.8
89% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.43
80% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $499
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback