Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '20 at 13:52
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 80.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 1,018 97% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,423 88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35% Below average	Lighting 45.3 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 37.9 37% 38.5 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 36.7 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB 7,448 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 24 22 22 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 456 Write 33.2 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 23.6 30% 144 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 17.6 76% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 27.3 36% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 56%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 53GB free Firmware: 1.28 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 56 60 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 191 Write 70.1 Mixed 103 SusWrite 56.2 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 24.1 98% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 78.2 64% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 49%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB 5,180 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 14GB free Firmware: STNSC014 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 586 Write 1,020 Mixed 478 156% 695 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 47.3 175% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 937 DQ Write 494 DQ Mixed 838 590% 756 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 387%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 301GB free Firmware: 2AR20003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 92.2 Write 68.7 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 71 53% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 271GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 96 96 97 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 106 Write 103 Mixed 56 SusWrite 96.3 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$30 16,451 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 143GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 197 196 197 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 69.2 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 197 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.6 12 12 11 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 72.5 Write 11.7 SusWrite 11.2 28% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 39% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 31.5 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 31.8 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	117x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	111x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	54x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	50x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	49x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	41x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16