Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 13:03
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
94% 165 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 724
79% 610 Pts
64-Core 716
48% 716 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Gigabyte(1458 403F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 214
Parallax 199
170% 208 fps
MRender 302
Gravity 231
Splatting 139
194% 224 fps
Poor: 156%
This bench: 181%
Great: 228%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$110
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 8,389
Write 7,346
Mixed 7,418
1,721% 7,717 MB/s
4K Read 706
4K Write 276
4K Mixed 388
1,714% 457 MB/s
DQ Read 1,773
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 1,205
967% 1,373 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
264GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 474 482 464 448 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 465
Mixed 430
SusWrite 447
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 66.6
224% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 133%
Great: 129%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 131 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 129
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
902GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 184 182 170 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 179
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
290GB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 105 107 85 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 66.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 101
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$79
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $185
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback