Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '20 at 15:12
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 87.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 863 77% 653 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A7) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 165 Parallax 177 135% 169 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 147 Splatting 108 117% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 320 186 197 188 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 440 Mixed 331 SusWrite 222 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 44.8 159% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 242 206% 305 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 107%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 48GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,360 Write 2,150 Mixed 1,515 446% 2,008 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 73.8 242% 83.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,327 DQ Write 1,013 DQ Mixed 1,151 866% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 669GB free Firmware: CV26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 104 104 104 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 154 Write 162 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 102 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 301GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 98 97 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 161 Write 103 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 97.2 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 551GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 121 123 123 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 98.5 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 119 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 509% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 178 184 184 185 183 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 108 Write 78.8 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 179 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 94.3 Write 65.3 Mixed 99.5 109% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 3.2 218% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 14.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,422x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,350x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,793x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,206x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,162x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	917x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,025x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	793x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	631x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	500x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	490x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	437x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,067

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16