Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 00:22
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 274
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,179
104% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,972
122% 1,972 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 93.2
44% 70.1 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 70.5
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 48%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 214 209 168 155 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 860
Write 669
Mixed 489
SusWrite 192
123% 553 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 47.6
186% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 395
348% 522 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 129%
Great: 144%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
351GB free
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 380 378 378 378 377 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 776
Mixed 612
SusWrite 404
151% 677 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 53.5
199% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 449
372% 537 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 148%
Great: 155%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 135 134 138 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 138
Mixed 103
SusWrite 136
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
288% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 90%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
8.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 247 244 242 233 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 175
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 240
126% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 132%
Great: 138%
ADATA NH13 1TB
39GB free, PID a13a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 62 80 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 57.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 88.1
79% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 22.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback