MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 20:43
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 106
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 661
60% 505 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 182
Parallax 218
152% 195 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 188
Splatting 114
143% 185 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 139%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 142 144 128 117 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 380
Write 364
Mixed 304
SusWrite 160
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 39.2
135% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 364
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 124%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$84
344GB free
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 357 365 369 366 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 413
Write 369
Mixed 345
SusWrite 358
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 31.4
107% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 294
241% 342 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 127%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
39GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,607
Write 1,350
Mixed 872
283% 1,276 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 56.9
162% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 933
686% 903 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
691GB free
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 357 371 374 369 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 338
Write 284
Mixed 229
SusWrite 362
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 24.7
98% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 247
202% 284 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 117%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
196GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 83 81 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 84.8
Write 69.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 80
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 32.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback