Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 17:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 132
59% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 416
40% 332 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.4% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 140
Parallax 120
94% 125 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 138 153 153 118 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 366
Write 208
Mixed 226
SusWrite 129
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 29.4
101% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 155
121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 85%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
212GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 231 228 228 230 228 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 475
Write 404
Mixed 349
SusWrite 236
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 39.7
136% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 156
145% 225 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$38
210GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 88.8
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback