Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 17:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 144
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 473
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 465
31% 465 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$450
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 140
Parallax 120
93% 125 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
106% 118 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$47
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 138 153 153 118 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 366
Write 208
Mixed 226
SusWrite 129
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 29.4
101% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 155
121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 83%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
212GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 231 228 228 230 228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 475
Write 404
Mixed 349
SusWrite 236
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 39.7
136% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 156
145% 225 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
210GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 88.8
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 3,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback