Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Tarox Business PC 5100 P7Q (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P7Q57-M DO
Memory	4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110511
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 93 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 125 64% 100 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 271 31% 243 Pts	64-Core 332 21% 332 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E305) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 51.2 Parallax 59.4 39% 52.7 fps	MRender 50.8 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 36.9 35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G2 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1029A SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 193 175 110 110 111 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 212 Write 197 Mixed 160 SusWrite 147 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 14.6 72% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 69.1 DQ Mixed 23.1 25% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 444GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 160 162 161 162 159 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 152 Write 160 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 158 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 107%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9.1 8.8 9.2 9.3 8.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	5.94% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 11.2 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 8.9 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.94% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples	1x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x
Raid 0 Volume 2TBIntelBench 320%, 7,823 samples	1x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16