HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 255 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 17:09
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 33.4
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 89.7
31% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 81.3
8-Core 85.7
11% 83.5 Pts
64-Core 80
5% 80 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 41 53 69 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 112
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 49.7
42% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 255 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 56%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback