HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '20 at 15:52
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	TUN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 173 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 512 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 838F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6344 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 9.92 Parallax 6.69 6% 7.88 fps	MRender 9.71 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 14 9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 28.2 Parallax 34.8 31% 33.8 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 39 Splatting 35 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 23,829 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 169 Write 695 Mixed 652 116% 505 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 43.5 144% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 797 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 147 188% 356 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 141%
Sabrent ROCKET-PRO 512GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 100GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 318 312 309 316 326 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 349 Write 337 Mixed 205 SusWrite 310 68% 300 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 13.4 56% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 59.3 62% 102 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 183%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 79GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 85 78 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 90 Mixed 19 SusWrite 89.7 52% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 159GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 113 114 110 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 76.5 Write 84.2 Mixed 85 SusWrite 107 66% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 172% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB 23,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.8% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 21.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 16.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,368x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	964x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,347x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	777x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	272x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16