Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dh0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8600
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200310
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '20 at 22:41
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 66.9 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 157 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 450 42% 350 Pts	64-Core 686 42% 686 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q) 7,789 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8600) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.5% Poor	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 34.8 30% 47.4 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 17 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 2TB 1,795 User benchmarks, average bench 247% 918GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB411D45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 667 727 413 175 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1,578 Write 646 Mixed 742 SusWrite 414 186% 845 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 41.3 135% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 490 DQ Write 392 DQ Mixed 460 339% 447 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 340%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: EB01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 124 125 124 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 68 SusWrite 124 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB 5,545 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 25 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 19.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	481x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 77%, 6,944 samples	274x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	219x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	265x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	176x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	112x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	347x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	80x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	78x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16