Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '20 at 16:13
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 83.2 1-Core 154 2-Core 294 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 995 93% 776 Pts	64-Core 1,504 93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2155 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 73.2 Reflection 74.5 Parallax 63.6 60% 70.4 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 68.8 57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 621 617 614 610 610 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,425 Write 1,470 Mixed 1,585 SusWrite 653 341% 1,533 MB/s	4K Read 62.2 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 83.7 281% 98.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1306 DQ Write 1,162 DQ Mixed 1,232 924% 1,233 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 49GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 152 151 128 126 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 444 Mixed 390 SusWrite 173 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 53.6 181% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 115%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 71GB free Firmware: 01.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 70 72 75 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 68.3 Write 68 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 73.1 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 43%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 185GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 113 115 118 113 118 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 110 Write 120 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 117 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 599GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 168 166 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 181 Mixed 108 SusWrite 167 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 108%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 46GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 59 59 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 84.7 Write 84.7 Mixed 49 SusWrite 58.8 91% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 32.4 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 32.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16