CMS 9500-0775A

Performance Results

Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 78%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemCMS 9500-0775A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 12:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 712
77% 600 Pts
64-Core 719
48% 719 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7.09
6% 7.96 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.07
Splatting 14.7
6% 9.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 127 155 143 143 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 411
Write 353
Mixed 165
SusWrite 143
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 10.2
66% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 36
46% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.M16FG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 9500-0775A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 9500-0775A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $34
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback