Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190905
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '20 at 05:05
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$164 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 135 2-Core 273 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 599 72% 553 Pts	64-Core 653 40% 653 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Zotac(19DA 4509) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 136 Parallax 151 124% 146 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 130 Splatting 107 110% 140 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 123%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB 14,867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0200S110 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 49 7.8 59 81 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 412 Write 112 Mixed 121 SusWrite 49.3 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 1.1 52% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 13.6 DQ Mixed 15.2 9% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 74,390 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.8% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 21.7 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 20.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac Builds (Compare 1,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 125%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 116%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $258Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	652x
Core i7-9700KFIntel $280Bench 97%, 32,736 samples	217x
Core i9-9900KIntel $427Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	212x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	393x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	154x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	127x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	93x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	90x
T253X2512G 512GBTeamBench 67%, 14,867 samples	68x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	167x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	88x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $724

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16