Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	20 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '20 at 01:53
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 135 60% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 433 41% 342 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3752) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 108 Parallax 118 95% 114 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 111 Splatting 84.6 89% 112 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 215 166 230 136 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 447 Write 354 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 195 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 11.8 94% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 13.1 64% 146 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 103%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 415GB free Firmware: Z331 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 154 162 178 159 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 338 Write 207 Mixed 217 SusWrite 162 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 19.8 95% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 29 66% 138 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 193 196 196 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 176 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 194 107% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 108%
Seagate Slim BK 500GB 653 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 266GB free Firmware: 6405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 28.2 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 23.6 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	9.95% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 11.4 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 3.4 14% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.95% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 18.7 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 13.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16