Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 72% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 00:56
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 56%
CPU Throttled 72%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 99
2-Core 191
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 668
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,470
91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 104
Parallax 99.9
87% 104 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 86
69% 84.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 146 157 134 149 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 957
Write 455
Mixed 454
SusWrite 190
113% 514 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 51.3
178% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 309
326% 534 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 134%
Great: 277%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
141GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 221 208 170 176 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 321
Write 224
Mixed 244
SusWrite 190
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 19.6
61% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 127
102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 65%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
12GB free
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 906
Write 1,062
Mixed 644
194% 870 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 44.3
162% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 871
674% 930 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 259%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
75GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 104 111 112 110 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46% Average
Read 127
Write 143
Mixed 125
SusWrite 113
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 25.4
89% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 125
100% 138 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
230GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 84 83 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41% Average
Read 60
Write 62.4
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 82.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
109GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 64
Write 66.9
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 83.8
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
411GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 135 136 132 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 102
Write 52
Mixed 58
SusWrite 132
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
694GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 89 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 74.2
Write 63.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 87
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 65%
Fujitsu HDD 2TB
51GB free, PID 0566
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 71.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 74.7
82% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 22.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback