MSI MS-179F

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GF72 8RD
Motherboard	MSI MS-179F (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 22:35
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 114 53% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 385 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 1222) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1881 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 31.4 8% 17.7 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 28 23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB 10,917 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 298 273 217 226 226 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 455 Write 405 Mixed 364 SusWrite 265 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 33.5 107% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 319 242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 116%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 895GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 119 118 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 36,753 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 11.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-179F Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-179F

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	119x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	72x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	130x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	52x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	9x

SSD
KSG60ZMV256G 256GBToshibaBench 71%, 2,376 samples	25x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	24x
RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,961 samples	22x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	50x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	20x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16